After claiming for years that behavior genetics is reactionary & meaningless, the NY Times suddenly reverses course to argue the new polygenic score research validates social justice progressivism. Pathetic opportunism. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/24/opinion/dna-nature-genetics-education.html …
-
It's an op ed...
I know it's an 'op ed'. Most NY Times propaganda is through 'op eds'. They allow plausible deniability.
-
-
that's one way of looking at it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Reads like word-salad. For one thing, your beef with the NYT has little relevance with what the article is saying (and considering how Robert Plomin has a similar view, you're gonna need to bring more than rhetoric). Its real knee-jerky reaction, and a close-minded one too.
-
Second, you're going to have to define what you mean by "propaganda" for it to not read like a thought-terminating cliche. Models that actually try to cover what propaganda is stress saturation and its systemic nature: just having a bunch of opinions you don't like doesn't count.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.