This is one of those moments when a Twitter poll is super useful. Looks like it would be a bad idea to use 'Pair Bonds' as the title of my next book....
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Never heard of it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I will almost always choose "sort of" when an expert asks me a question like this -- even if I'm quite familiar with the literature. I figure the person probably has some new distinction in mind that I haven't considered.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
in chemistry? vague memory that it's when two atoms share an...electron? chemistry class was a looooong time ago.
-
Thought same so chose ‘sort of’ but perhaps he means in mating sense? Think I saw same term after the “enforced monogamy” kerfuffle
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I do, big fan of Dr Doug Lisle. He’s mentioned in once or twice.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you know what a D7+9b13 is? We all got our own mojo, man . . .
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, I do. I heard you, Bret Weinstein, and Heather Heying use the term recently. I’m a plugged-in cat, man. I’m grooving with the zeitgeist of our times. I’m one with the Tao . . .
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think I do. But maybe I'm wrong....do I "know" it then?
-
Also, if I am not completely wrong, it could refer to both living creatures (like humans) and hydrogen atoms.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.