Imagine a scientist has a lot of tattoos. Do you take their research less seriously?
Show this thread
-
-
Wtf does a tattoo have to do with scientific theories?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Many w/extensive body art, are telling a story, one that evolves throughout the course of their lives and can be anything but static/dogmatic. Poll is too generalized as well. If a chemical scientist has a shitty tat due to poor quality ink I may question their scientific rigor
-
btw, tattoos are often inked over, altered and more recently removed with laser tech. Kinda like a lot of outdated scientific theories.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.