Seems to me, if the Left cared about reducing global warming, they'd support nuclear power and geoengineering research, instead of attacking the free markets that are lifting billions out of poverty.https://twitter.com/neiltyson/status/1018928667215499273 …
-
-
Also genetic engineering of crops allows farmers to sequester vast quantities of carbon in the soil. You might find the Ecomodernist Manifesto to be interesting http://www.ecomodernism.org/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Greenpeace are not "the left."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The pharmacist does not want to cure your illness, she wants a repeat customer.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Greenpeace hardly represents most environmentally conscious people. Plus, it doesn’t help to be swimming upstream against a current of loud and well-funded climate change denialists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nuclear is very green in the production of energy. The waste is a problem, but maybe there is something that could be done about, I dunno.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Left would cut off kerosene in the Dominican Republic if they had their way. Then the energy starved people could deforest it like their neighbors on the other side of the island.
#conservationThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here's the problem with nuclear: you're one well organized deranged terrorist away from global annihilation. Which doesn't mean we shouldn't do it, but it's certainly a factor that should be considered!
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.