My friends on the left should take comfort from the fact--and it is a fact--that a 9-0 conservative SCOTUS could not do more than dent the revolution that the left majority worked on the Constitution from 1937–42. Trash the enumerated powers, and there's no way back.
-
-
The key word is "general", which by definition would be limited in scope so as to apply to everyone (functioning economy, infrastructure). The bastardization in use today applies to specialized groups only. It cannot be "general" welfare if it applies to a small number only.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That argument is guilty of anachronism. In the 18th century sense, "general Welfare" meant providing the basic public goods that Adam Smith would have approved of (maybe not even that- I'm no expert). The modern use of 'welfare' as a euphemism for socialism is not relevant.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
General welfare is a purpose, not a power. There would have been no point in laying out specific powers of each branch if the founders just wanted to say "The government can do whatever it wants."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
By saying, "look, I wouldn't have signed the Constitution, alright?"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If “anachronism” doesn’t kill off the second amendment “right to own a gun the founders never dreamt of”, I don’t see how it can make “general welfare” not include health, education and housing.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.