I can think of many, many good outcomes and not many bad ones. There's a human capital loss if the top math/science students don't get the most advanced training, but not much if we're talking about the social sciences and humanities.https://twitter.com/nils_gilman/status/1012772931829526528 …
-
-
Only if elite schooling continues to serve as a signal. Random assignment would eliminate that, though it would increase screening costs it would open everyone’s eye’s to a broader talent pool.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is true, most MPs in Parliament can't explain the difference between the budgetary defect and the national debt, nor can they explain the difference between the balance of trade and the balance of payments, and don't even mention normal distribution...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm sure there's a positive correlation, and I'm sure the correlation is less than 1.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Likewise, only a small percentage of students are mentally prepared to benefit from a rigorous instruction in the differential calculus of turbulence in complex fluidic systems. That value would be wasted on lottery-selected simpletons.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wonder whether too much meritocracy would hurt on this front. People want to see surrogates for themselves on the screen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How do you define ‘pure merit’?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
