If the mating value of a woman for long-term relationships depends to a considerable extent on physical attractiveness, shouldn´t high school teach them to increase it, in the same way they could teach men to look attractive and both to improve their mating intelligence skills?
A rational, fully privatized high school system could teach whatever aspects of mate value, courtship skills, and relationship insights are deemed useful by parents and students. Let the free market decide, and shut down gov't controlled schools, which will always be sex-negative
-
-
Your level of certainty about the free market on education is wrong, given the evidence. https://niskanencenter.org/blog/moral-imperative-school-choice/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I always assumed that US schools were the most free market of all and that sex-negativity was a product of that, since it, somewhat ironically, seems to sustain the relatively high birth rate of the US.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are multiple reasons to privatize education, but I had never looked through this lense before.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.