Question: In a world where AI has not only advanced to the point of being able to have human level experiences, but has eclipsed us in that regard (and in every other regard) would it be immoral for humanity to continue existing and using resources (assuming the AI let us live)?
-
-
-
If the humans or the AIs were actually resource-limited, that would be a serious issue. But I can't envision us running out of matter/energy in this supercluster.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
AlphaGo does nothing that is in any way analogous to a conversation with other machines.
-
It plays against copies of itself. That's pretty analogous.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@myriam Seems like pretty slow progress to me, but I measure time on a human scale.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“The question can machines think is too meaningless to warrant discussion” - Turing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The partly eaten apple, in the Apple logo is thought to be related to the poison he took injected into an apple when he committed suicide, or off-cause Newton.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He wasn't talking about adversarial neural networks because they don't exhibit anything resembling thinking in the sense Turing charted out
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The AI machine has already taken control - it's called Government!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's important to note that other great men of computer science took the opposite view, that the early work already showed why machines were mathematically limited.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.