Not sure what you're reading, but it wasn't this article, which explored quite a few of the nuances in a more than perfunctory manner
The NY Times is in a witless panic that lawmakers are pushing public universities to protect free speech and stop students from shouting down speakers (the 'heckler's veto'). The partisan hypocrisy here is breathtaking.https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/06/14/us/politics/campus-speech-protests.html#click=https://t.co/p2GZuM0lcB …
-
-
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It’s long overdue. Skin in the game matters. So far there’s been none for the illiberals. We can promote the virtues of viewpoint diversity until we’re blue in the face, but bullies only stop when the consequences hit them where it hurts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To recognize the problem exists at all is progress of a kind.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And I'm strongly in the free speech, let controversial voices be heard school of thought
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What a heck going on...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I thought balances as well. And I am very much in favor of free speech and detest de-platforming, as a word (hideous) and as a goal
End of conversation
-
-
-
Thank God! Disruption of higher learning is bad enough, but when people are spending thousands of dollars to further their careers. Lawsuits should have already been filed at this point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Startling, breathtaking hypocrisy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.