They should chose babies designed to look more like modern art paintings, preferably cubism.
Humans can choose mates with 'better' heritable traits. Should they?https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/06/10/us/11retro-baby-genetics.html#click=https://t.co/Be5Tbzhscc …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That would increase the gap between the poor and the rich.
#Gattacapic.twitter.com/vY6G9AyuaRThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes why not improve ourselves as a species if we have the ability to do so
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It would be morally wrong not to
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I <3 GATTACA
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depends on the costs and the impact of false hopes. Then there's also the bogeyman of unintended consequences.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
most definitely.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The real question is, how can you stop them?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Should we?" That is an irrelevant question. It won't happen right away, but those who do improve their gene lines will eventually dominate the world. Those who don't will eventually go extinct. The tricky part will be figuring out what is and isn't an 'improvement.'
-
I don't know if "extinct" is the right word when we're all the same species, but I take your meaning. I'm curious what countries will make it socialized and available for everyone, and if so how would a country of hand-picked superiors fair against a stratified one.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.