I'm a little disappointed to see you feed the "social justice vs. x-risk" culture war (aka "X is a distraction from the real problem, Y"). Personally, I don't think we are in a zero-sum regime, where it makes sense to focus on which of SJ or x-risk gets more of any single pie.
-
-
-
If you'd be up for it, I'd be interested to find out what assumptions we disagree on here. For example, what pies do you think are being split: journalistic airtime, research areas chosen by policy researchers, small-dollar charitable giving, Bay Area party smalltalk topics, etc?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nuclear war is no bueno! An asteroid would be really shitty too. I’d actually be curious to know what’s more statistically likely to cause extinction. Regardless, it’s hard to appreciate existential threats when you’re facing more immediate ones (poverty, crime, brutality etc.)
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Wow, this is totally why...pic.twitter.com/Xcw4jzKAVl
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn moreThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Smh. I’ve not yet seen a satisfactory analysis of the concept of “privilege.” Maybe it gets its moral power from resentment. But resentment is not automatically valid. An unexamined “fairness” premise may be the presupposition for the callout, and it may be be hopelessly utopian.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is there a better way to employ privilege than trying to avert nuclear annihilation?
-
Yes. It's mass SJW movement.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.