*citation needed*
FWIW, I've never seen a discussion of human mating behavior improved by using the terms 'alpha male' or 'beta male'. Scientists rarely use them in describing humans, and men with high formidability, status, and/or mate value don't bother calling themselves 'alphas'.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
If a man (or woman, for that matter) describes himself as alpha, he probably isn’t.
-
Unless you're training Velociraptors. Then it's ok.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Alpha/Beta is a helpful heuristic base for complex sexual phenomena Average dudes just trying to get laid for once aren't discussing multivariate analyses Theoretical / Practical divide
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Men that spend a lot of time talking about mating behavior (=SEDUCERS) DO use these terms... they are quite explanatory. You can use high-/low-status, high-/low-value, high-/low SMP, etc. But ALPHA/BETA are great shorthand. I'd add the SIGMA/OMEGA distinctions as well.
-
Scientists, generally, are known for being great with women....
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
lambda omega lambda
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scientists do use these terms for animals. However it seems that we don’t see ourselves as animals (even though we are). And as with many other high status titles, if you have to refer to yourself as “alpha”, you ain’t alpha.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s the same with women. Weak minded women may think only of appearances, strong minded women want a partner
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.