I expect your audience leans too far towards (1) because of their focus on Twitter/controversial/far-left opinion journalism. When in reality, I'd guess most journalists are operating on a much more factual, local, news-oriented, layperson level.
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s probably 1 or 2, a 50/50 chance depending on the journalist, with a wildcard 3 thrown in once in a blue moon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I voted just show results. I don't watch 'journalists' anymore (I wouldn't call someone like Tucker Carlson a 'journalist'; he has integrity) . I also don't date skanky women or eat glass.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Here’s my advice: You can talk about the genetics of race. You can talk about the genetics of intelligence. But stop implying they’re the same thing. Connecting intelligence to race adds nothing useful."
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Im still skeptical of the claim that academic achievement tests correlate so well with IQ though. The former seems more knowledge based, as opposed to raw http://intelligence.Plus people raise their scores significantly sometimes.Contradicting the existence of a "static" score.
-
The correlation is by no means perfect. The main predictors of achievement are intelligence and conscientiousness, and there's still some space for the influence of other, more malleable factors like motivation.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A factual option would be "mostly genetic over the life span; mostly environmental across generations". (I know most journalists have yet to read Flynn.)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.