It is weird seeing it called radical and new, because that notion has been there before. Alan Fridlund brought it up. It has been understood. I’m so annoyed when history of a field is ignored.
Yes, but it's not just that facial 'expressions of emotion' evolved to socially manipulate others. It's that many emotions themselves, all the way down, evolved to do that.https://digest.bps.org.uk/2018/05/02/a-radical-new-theory-proposes-that-facial-expressions-are-not-emotional-displays-but-tools-for-social-influence/amp/#click=https://t.co/3cUBwvbrS7 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure. And our difficulty hiding our emotions — not showing them on our faces — may also be evolved, signaling our trustworthiness. Others less willing to cooperate with stone-faced types who can hide their emotions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You’re only saying that because you think we don’t already think that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That’s only the social media (or American) version of ‘education.’
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yes, but it's not just that being emotionally manipulable by others' facial "expressions of emotion" evolved. It's that one person's expressions of emotions facilitate changes in another's emotional state and this reverberates between them to a point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.