Some belief states, while coherent, don't seem to follow from any perceptual history in a mind with familiar perceptual processes.
-
-
Replying to @preinfarction
It is coherent for general agents to have incompressible beliefs, but humans should still usually be able to justify theirs.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @preinfarction
We should be able to do so even while being vigilant against the fact that we hallucinate false explanations on a dime.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @preinfarction
There's a title of a paper I never got around to reading that pops into my phonological loop often:
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @preinfarction
"Telling more than we can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @preinfarction
I think the title has poisoned a lot of my thinking in the past by making me too distrustful of introspection.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I think an informed perspective of the (in)accuracy of introspection will make a good next post for my blog, once I have it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.