many things are already fake but i'm hoping "you're sharing things that were literally written by a bot" is a more socially enforceable bright line
-
-
Replying to @VesselOfSpirit
Marian Rinehart Retweeted ⓢⓗⓐⓡⓓⓒⓞⓡⓔ ⧖
I think people posting poetry http://antinegationism.tumblr.com/post/182901133106/an-eternal-howl … and scripture https://twitter.com/erocdrahs/status/1097554964824629249 … written by gpt-2 are doing a good thing, and it wouldn't be a much worse thing if they didn't say that it was written by gpt-2 provided that they also liked the text.
Marian Rinehart added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @preinfarction @VesselOfSpirit
And similarly, I don't think it's a hardline sin to post an argument written by a bot if you agree with the argument, even if you couldn't have generated the argument yourself.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @preinfarction @VesselOfSpirit
You seem to be using "fake" as a genetic accusation, but a person's reasons for posting a text can screen off the fact that the text was originally generated by a process that wasn't honest or truth-seeking.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Marian Rinehart Retweeted Curl Of Gradient
what if sharing things *not* written by a bot is the more morally pressing kind of fakenesshttps://twitter.com/CurlOfGradient/status/1100203291324153859 …
Marian Rinehart added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.