It’s so fascinating to see (ostensibly) white people use “white” as a slur against other whites. We are witnessing an evolution of racial identity politics. Here are my thoughts on what is going on (thread):https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1049310554953641984 …
-
Show this thread
-
1. Just as “whiteness” is often used in the place of what was formerly known as “white privilege”, “white” is increasingly used as a dogwhistle for “white supremacist”. The focus of the derision shifts from the sin (supremacy/privilege) to the sinner (whites).
9 replies 63 retweets 453 likesShow this thread -
2. At the same time, “white” (in lefty circles) is morphing into an ideological category, which can be joined/abandoned. Whites can absolve themselves of their “whiteness” by adopting the "right" politics, POC can become avatars for “whiteness” by adopting disagreeable politics.
10 replies 85 retweets 552 likesShow this thread -
3. In other words, while the terminology used (signifier) becomes explicitly racial, the meaning is becoming detached from race altogether, referring instead to a brand of politics. This is not common outside elite circles, so understandably it leads to confusion and anger.
7 replies 45 retweets 417 likesShow this thread -
4. This is how you end up with the Sarah Jeongs of the world. Perhaps she is a racist (her tweets indicate she is), but it is likely that her language really is (as repeated by her defenders) a *performance*. It might indicate real racial hate, but it doesn’t necessarily need to.
10 replies 36 retweets 360 likesShow this thread -
5. This may be sounding like a defense of her words - I assure you it is not! Instead, I think the fury directed towards her was aiming at the wrong target. Jeong was defended by a whole cast of progressive writers, nurtured by elite institutions, and now is legitimized by them.
5 replies 30 retweets 333 likesShow this thread -
6. She did not come about in a vacuum, nor were her tweets shocking to her coherts. She, and others like her, are the products of a system that has tacitly accepted ways of speaking and describing the world which have nothing to do with how things actually *are* (reality)…
4 replies 43 retweets 401 likesShow this thread -
7. ...but rather, the language is increasingly formed by how they believe the world should be and how it should become that way (politics), and to signal to others their devotion to the “cause”.
3 replies 31 retweets 314 likesShow this thread -
8. This is disaster for everyone, but most of all for actual *progress*. Accurate, meaningful communication is rendered difficult when words do not mean what they literally say, and correct interpretation requires first an intimate understanding of the underlying ideologies.
7 replies 79 retweets 558 likesShow this thread -
9. It will be interesting to see how far this goes, the absurdity is already overwhelming. What happens to civil society when discourse cannot arrive at meaning? How do we persuade, how do we move forward together when we increasingly speak in different tongues? (fin)
72 replies 56 retweets 627 likesShow this thread
See also @slatestarcodex's excellent blog:http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/09/30/i-can-tolerate-anything-except-the-outgroup/ …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.