Safe, legal access to abortions leads to fewer abortions, fewer botched abortions, lower rates of death while giving birth and more babies carried to term. But, sure, call it "pro-life"
If you're referring to elective abortion, then no-that doesn't follow. Not even remotely.
-
-
I'm referring to the question in the specific scenario I proposed that you never answered. That you side-stepped answering it directly speaks volumes.
-
No offense, but that's not a very useful question. I've never heard of a condition that can be detected at 19 weeks that will pose a 50/50 risk to the mother some *21 weeks* later. But to give an answer, no. I would not support aborting a baby in the absence of medical urgency.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.