Can we force youtube to carry PragerU but not force a baker to provide services for a gay wedding? What is the defining principle that allows for both?
-
New conversation
-
-
-
Although Google & YouTube are private companies. When large Social Networks write "algorithms" specifically targeting... (1/2)
-
(2/2) ... Conservatives & libertarians, then these group are specifically being told they must sit in the Back of the Bus
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Freedom of speech isn’t in the handbook of liberal ideology and it’s a one way right. Keep fighting!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Google and YouTube are private companies. Although I am against censorship, under the law they are not required to let PragerU, or anyone for that matter, to post on their sites. It’s wrong to think of this as a “freedom of speech” issue. PragerU can post on its own site freely.
-
That is not true once a company declares itself a neutral public forum.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Are the motion to dismiss and dismissal order online anywhere other than subscription-based PACER?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.