He spent more than a minute talking about his credentials but forgot to mention that his organization is funded by Exxon-Mobile
The rest of the video was just slander, climate scientists take great measures to adjust for the mentioned factors. His example? Weather abnormality.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
...oh man, here come the religious left.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The chemicals sprayed in skies need to stop! They don't know what outcome will be.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
My specific criticisms were his gross misrepresentation of climate science and his use of weather abnormality as an example against climate models. Don't exist? GMI took 715K from Exxon-Mobile before reforming into the industry-backed CO2 Coalition in 2015.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How to tell when your ‘science’ isn’t really science... 1. When you have to alter data or your equation simply because you don’t like the prediction or the result. 2. You lash out and slander anyone who questions your predictions or findings.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
All junk science. These frauds can’t predict what’s going to happen next Eileen with 100% accuracy and they want me to buy into what’s going to happen in 100 years? They can go EFF Off.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Freezing in the Dark, Famine, Starvation and Injustice, to name a few.
- 2 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
