There's an argument for relocating some Confederate statues, but tearing them down in mobs or lumping in the Founding Fathers is madness.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He probably represented slavery to the people he owned.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That distinction won't matter to many.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course it's unfair, but that doesn't mean (the very idea!) it's not being made.. by this guy, for ex,
@MSNBC's own James Brown ex-roadiepic.twitter.com/GoYDDuPdb0
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Wanna bet? Go to Colonial Williamsburg and listen to some of the interactions the Jefferson interpreter has with guests.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here's the fix: as of tomorrow, all statues will be called- "Man on Horse"
Problem solved. #ManOnHorseThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
i think he beleive the slaves were safer w him thant setting them free thy would have been recaptured n re inslaved my op
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The difference between representing and passively condoning does not matter to the people targeting confederate monuments.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The only way your comparison would make sense is if sex trafficking was normalized, as slavery was then. Applies to cartel community, not US
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.