only after the border is secure and illegal employment dries up and the criminals are removed. Then we can begin considering
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
I wanted to vote yes but accidentally hit no lol
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The perfect recipe for decades of Jim Crow second-class citizenship rhetoric. Delay later than legal immigrants is fine, though.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This isn't a yes or no question. It depends A LOT on what they've done here and if they are productive citizens. Then, possibly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
legal residence yes, but NEVER citizenship.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is not a Q. of "Yes" or "No"! it depends on every individual's circumstances.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
isn't citizenship the whole point? Why a path to residence? Seems like a tax/representation problem.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If they pay there potion total long term unfunded liabilities are at $126 trillion, a $1.1 million liability for each U.S. taxpayer
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.