only if you consider oil companies people. oh wait, you guys do
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Weird, I thought only Alex Jones was concerned about post-humanism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is not “modern environmentalists.“ Most green thinkers today are focused overwhelmingly on how the environment impacts human well-being.
-
I’ll admit I thought I might find an anti-human undertone at times in the
#GreenNewDeal movement, but that has not at all been the case. Everyone is talking about how to keep human beings safe, healthy, and flourishing for years to come. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
For non-human beings, yes it would be
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The world would be so much more enjoyable without people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Humans: Top of the food chain. Be good stewards of what we’ve been given. (The Earth) Why aren’t the countries with billions of people the focus of this rage. It seems like the countries who are already making enormous efforts are the ones who are shamed for not doing more.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That’s because they fail to realize you can achieve the same thing WITHOUT killing 75% of the population
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We went from wood to coal and that helped us for about 250yrs so now its time to move to the next level of discovery as we have learned a lot in the last 250yrs. These are the same people who would've complained about coal 250yrs ago by telling us to keep using wood.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.