Thanks for the recommendation, just picked it up! Fantastic so far.
-
-
-
Happy reading!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The interesting thing about this nonsense as it was used in the Russian revolution, is that the revolutionaries who claimed to be about the “working man” didn’t really want to give them a voice, they only used them as visual means for their overthrow. Sounds vaguely familiar.

- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Excellent! Estrin makes the discussion personal. Like Prager did in the opening of this series. Personalizing the experience with the book makes the discussion a lot more interesting. The host did his homework and does a great job with quotes and the flow. The book sounds amazing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great book!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Based solely on the title, is it all blank pages?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
I think CS Lewis said something about a more intelligent man having greater capacity for good or evil. Marx & Rousseau didn't choose that of Augustine or Dostoevsky, but that of self. Tools of evil, perhaps unaware. Intelligence doesn't prevent delusion, it makes it more complex
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is actually a question I have been pondering lately. Outside of extreme weather events, I can't think of one atrocity or disaster that intellectuals either didn't cause or could fix.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.