Until you provide evidence of this claim, It's wealthy oil, gas, and coal tycoons that won't support the switch to nuclear, because it will cut into their profits If they moved money into research for cleaner and safer nuclear practices, rather than propaganda, we'd see progress
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Totally clean except for the radioactive waste that will be lethal for up to 10,000 years and we still don't know what to do with itpic.twitter.com/JM6TrZF2Yq
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because they really don’t care about the environment. They care about power and control.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Prager doesn't talk about how much we are subsidizing nukes?https://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2019/04/23/nuclear-energy-climate-change-000893 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
You can even consider Nuclear Plasma, an infinite source of energy.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
They do. Then they get Hillary to sell it to Russia.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Clean