So here are the arguments presented for anyone who wants to save 5 minutes: 1. We haven’t found life on other planets. 2. A couple of quotes from scientists and skeptics (which could be taken out of context) 3. The universe just couldn’t have been by accident.
-
-
-
3. We don’t know enough to know how anything came to be, so by saying that there has to be a creator, is solving a mystery with an even larger mystery. Not only that, if there needs to be a creator, who made the creator if something can’t come from nothing?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I shall always treasure my then 7 yr old niece who stated rather emphatically "well Who do you think created that Big Bang in the first place?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We have only been searching for life outside our solar system for about 50 years light can’t even tribe a fraction of our galaxy in that time. Like let’s say some allies say our planet about three billion light-years away right now they wouldn’t be able to see any life or
-
reserve any messages we have sent to them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Does science argue for or against god?" have you considered: n e i t h e r .
-
Science however argues against many interpretations of god
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Science proves we live in a simulation, something had to create the simulation, therefore there has to be a God.
-
Science doesn’t prove we live in a simulation to prove that we’d have to make a simulation of our universe, and then that simulation would need to do the same, and that doesn’t even prove we are in one just that we could be.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Please ignore the contradictions between the bible and reality
-
Such as?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.