Before the Cambrian Explosion there were no vertebrate animals. Most fossils are skeletons, therefore, when skeletons evolved we got an “explosion” of fossils. There are rare fossils from before the Cambrian Explosion, and chemical signatures of skeleton-less sea life.
-
-
-
“When skeletons evolved”. There should be a plethora of this evolutionary change including minor skeletal findings all over the fossil record, not “rare fossils”. Evolution is change over time. So in the process of evolution there arose skeletons suddenly and voila?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The problem I have with this is the assumption that the cambrian explosion represents a sudden "appearance" of life. Self-evidently, it represents a sudden death of organisms. The flood can quite easily explain this. Fossils are rare, especially in a sea teeming with scavengers
-
which flood?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'd like to see a 3-fold debate adding Rupert Sheldrake and his morphic field ideas vs Stephen's ID and vs the mechanistic materialist of some notable scientist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Whoa...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1/ You expose your own ignorance of science when you claim Darwin's theory has been unquestioned. It has been subject to constant question and refinement ever since. As for Newton's theory of gravity, I can't imagine how you could remain ignorant of Einstein. Meyer is not a
-
scientist - his Ph.D. is in philosophy. His pseudo-scientific arguments are generally derided by scientists with actual knowledge of the subject.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Evolution & Gravity haven't been theories in a long time.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.