but wait, I thought private entities could do whatever they wanted? weird.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the Will of rights
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Indeed, Prager should post a video: "The Art Of Cherry Picking To Win Every Argument".
End of conversation
-
-
-
at question is if major new and social media sites like YouTube, Facebook, and twitter are "common carriers". IF they are, even abet private companies. They cannot censor. Even though right now they are highly restrictive And biased to leftist ideology
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The real heart of the issue is that twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and google have become so big as such they may be considered common carriers under US law. Common carriers under US law, even private, cannot censor
-
How does US law, specifically under the FCC, a regulatory and licensing agency define YouTube as a "common carrier" ( a designation typically reserved for telecommunication companies)? If Google/YouTube was a public utility, which it's not, such regulating would come into play.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.