Our impact is minimal, some resources are limited, we do need to conserve and manage, you can't save every animal, we do need focus on sustainable resources, we don't need fear mongering, and unless there's some sci-fi miracle energy discovery this world has an expiration date.
-
-
-
If you want to live a good life, be good stewards with what we have, reasonable and realistic. If you think we're destroying the planet, then the only hope would be to destroy most every modern convenience and revert to primative existence, or wipe man completely from existence
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You mean its like "weather"? I was raised that we had an IMPENDING Ice Age and the population explosion would mean there wouldn't be enough food to go around. AND that darn ozone hole we were going to burn up, until the Acid Rain fell on us. Oh and Killer Bees.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The main thing to realize from charts if CO2 vs. Warming is: Warming results in higher CO2 pct, not the other way around! At NO time has higher CO2 caused global warming. Scientific fact.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Yes, at this rate. And Three times the CO2 pct, too. (Not sure if going from 0.035% to 0.04% is much change.)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It was happening, it is happening and it will happen, but Now I am beginning to understand the reason. We were dying, we are dying and we will die, but now we have reduced the rate of dying. With reason many things are bearable!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's the SUN....it will always be the SUN.....BUT....you can't tax the sun as being "man made"......
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
The Roman Warm Period