I think I recall learning in school that plants breathe CO2 and need it to survive. Plants then, in turn, give us O2. It seems to me instead of wrecking every economy in the world that it would be more beneficial to plant trees, which in turn can be harvested and replanted.
-
-
-
Logic would dictate, but the hippies (their arch enemy from decades past) would then be right. The real problem... it has nothing to do with CO2, the planet or environmentalism. Let that sink in. It's about fear, turning the screws on the masses, and control. $ to grease the

- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Group 3: "politicians, environmentalists and media" or as i call them, activists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Group 4. Everyone currently impacted by global warming and who will be exponentially impacted if the problem isn’t addressed in a serious way by the scientists and politicians who have been entrusted with gathering data and making congruent policy. Group 4 = all on Earth.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
M.I.T. is notorious for softballing climate data, and they refuse to acknowledge solar forcing, OR the fact that we're ass deep in a magnetic incursion. Don't be fooled by their reputation, go look at papers at Elsevier or the Journal of Astrophysics
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
While I am quite determined about my endorsement with
@IPCC_CH assessment on climate change (Referred to as Group 1 in the video), I shall agree that some global warming alarmist groups keep misrepresenting climate risks as existential threats to the whole biosphere.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Starts with action, then pressure, then tariffs!
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.