There is absolutely nothing in science that "argues for the existence of God".
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this is LOWKEY a reach but go off
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I like PragerU sometimes but this just makes feel like I shouldn't. Science doesn't care about the existence of God, that's why it works, it just follows a scientific methodology. Leaving pre-concieved beliefs out of that is key to it's success.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Science doesn't say anything about spiritual things.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In the past, most scientists were religious. They weren't looking for proof because they already had faith. Religion is an essential counter-balance to both science and politics.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Interesting how atheists take life on earth for granted, but deny the possibility of a greater, omnipotent life.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Beware the distinction between Metaphysical Naturalism and Methodological Naturalism that is often deployed on this issue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s not a fuse! Nice try though! It is much harder to believe in magical sky wizards! Then to believe in the Big Bang
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.