I think celebrities truly believe this nonsense because they’re useful idiots. Climate sensationalism is part of a long history of the political elite trying to gain more power and wealth at the cost of our freedoms.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It should raise


when celebrities & politicians are more outspoken on the subject than the scientific community. Meanwhile
back in realitypic.twitter.com/yAhTGUkYzp
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Man, why do they keep lying about that 97% statistic? It's like when they lie about the pay gap. Even The Guardian has disproved the 97% stat. https://theguardian.com/environment/blog/2014/jun/06/97-consensus-global-warming … These people treat data like it's law, unaware that it's just as easy to manipulate as anything else.
-
Also worth noting the debate on climate change is framed as "skeptics vs. deniers" for political purposes, but that's not an accurate way to frame the debate. Rather, it's between people who believe predictions made by consistently inaccurate climate models and those who don't.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Here we go again, the link to watch the Prague video would not load, I thought it was global warming, now it's climate change, of course you morons nothing stays the same, and the glacier in Chicago has not started to recede this year it's only - 21 with the wind chill right now,
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t believe anyone who leaves the
out of the argument. The powerhouse of the solar system is the biggest influence on our plant.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's why I own a scanning company. Go paperless! It amazes me how many people don't wnt to get rid of paper. Like the university's. http://scann2view.com
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There was a point in history when 97% of the population thought the world was flat, so that logic is obviously upheld
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
No, here’s what scientists have to say: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
-
You have linked to what the IPCC have to say. That is a political body, with a few scientists in it, but far more bureaucrats. Here is also what scientists have to say, scientists who are not beholden to a political organisation. https://realclimatescience.com/
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.