Pure capitalism is 99 percent poor 2 percent rich, yet agian disengenious attempt to compare pure socialism to capitalism / socialism , instead of pure capitalism! Which is what prager’s revenue stream would like.
-
-
-
Anyone who has played the game of Monopoly knows that pure capitalism means one player wins, and everyone else is bankrupt.https://youtu.be/cxOmaQx4BY4
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I lived in USSR unfortunately we all know how it ended. All life savings my parents had dissolved with inflation to nothing. Socialism only works good on papers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
for real???? i mean i loive "Why i left the left" by dave rubin but this one...hmmm yooooo
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Let’s correct your illustration: The top 1% own/control like 80% of the $. $ buys elections & control. So what we have is a capitalist system known as a Plutocracy. Correcting that imbalance is what needs to happen.
-
More government is not the answer, chances are it would only make things worse. To stop the 1% having control like you say we must have government out of the economy. No more corporate welfare. Let’s have really competition that allows large companies to fail.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Freedom. Artists can create what they want - even create down with capitalism paintings, music or whatever. With socialism, artists may have to FARM to eat. Artists hands do not matter.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's what made this country 1 in the world
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
