Yes, because when the public is disarmed, criminals have free reign. This is particularly true in rural areas where there are few deputies and they travel long distances. Without guns we are sitting ducks out here.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Love Charlie Kirk... wise young man.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn't
@charliekirk11 the guy who shuns universal healthcare for the free market, then whined like a baby about the current healthcare system when he had to wait in line to be seen? You guys are severely lacking in self-reflection, and won't be around much longer.#HACKS - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sometimes it is that simple.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
True very True.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I literally don't care about the wall nor know if it will help or not. The more important thing: In your opinion, border security and filtering people is good or pointless?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You really can't understand/or don't want to understand certain points. The key thing is, not 100% of the people are good->if you let anyone in, you let bad people in too. Visa, border check, papers, etc. Everything checked and deemed okay, you let those in. Simple.
-
Plus literally 0 country out there are prepared for an endless influx of people, especially in a short period of time. You probably don't know much about economy. How would you take care of another 1-10-100millions of people if you don't have enough money,schools, hospitals, etc?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


