Yes it is. The death penalty has between a 4%-11% margin of error depending on what state you are in. It’s a disgrace it has not been abolished.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Amen
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Now the problem becomes what is 1,000 guilty lives versus the life of 1 innocent man? Or another, the dollar cost of the death penalty after appeals?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I do think it is a contradiction. First justice can be flawed and could decide to terminate an innocent individual. On a more spiritual side, I believe that this prevents repentance and throws them right into hell.
-
Is it not only god's right to decide who have to die? Is a sinner still a holy creation of god as every human? As god is mercyfull, he offers repentance to everyone, isn't?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
Yes, it most certainly is a contradiction, one that we live with. Of course, during an intellectual-circle-jerk there must have been much slicing and dicing to create a distinction that fits comfortably within their moral model.
-
There is no contradiction. Pro-life is everyone deserving a chance. The death penalty is for after choices have been made. It's a question of innocence.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
