Not even Zuckerberg could define hate speech when asked by @sensasse earlier this year. @benshapiro
-
-
-
If they defined
#HateSpeech , then they would be limited. Better for them to let it remain whatever they want it to be. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@GOP when will Congress get serious and TAKE ON these censored platforms that are NOW part of every day life. This is a REAL THREAT to our Free Speech rights! Do SOMETHING!!! -
The very last thing you want to do is have the government get involved in private business. Unless they are refusing to hire someone or they are harassing an employee because of who they are , let the market decide their fate. Don't use the product.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
People knock this idea but I’m seriously ready for a new social media platform to emerge that IS NOT “balanced” or “apolitical” but entirely controlled by conservatives/libertarians who do not censor any lawful speech whatsoever. It’s time folks
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
That's rich. All day long they have been talking about Trump silencing Brennon and FB silences.
-
Yup! Irony in action! I hope Trump jerks ALL of their clearances, including Hildabeast's. Just go right down the line of fired/retired agents, department heads, politicians, etc. Why does McPain still need his? He's Missing In Action for the last 9 months! Revoke 'em all! MAGA!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You must not be restricted! We will not give up!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Let me just say I don't care much for politics at all. I do however care for being respectful, old school manors and values. Giving back to the community is a must. I find these far left tech companies absolutely reprehensible lately! It's getting ridiculous!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.