If someone links to a pre-2010 blog post/article, you immediately know that it is going to be a worthwhile read.
Show this thread
-
Social networks need to have new content for you when you log in, so that you do not lose your interest in them and log in more often. This implies that their feed will always be mostly time-based.
Show this thread
But from the outside it seems very weird and even absurd that we would want content to be ordered by creation time! Who, when looking at two books, would compare them by their creation dates?
-
-
One way people seem to have been dealing with this is various top posts: best books of the year, daily/weekly/monthly links posts.
Show this thread -
Such monthly links compilations exchange timeliness for quality: the links in them are less timely, but presumably selected from a large pool of candidates, so they are of higher quality.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.