Yea, you're right. Like the conflict of interest of a Sunday morning show moderator named @chucktodd covering Clinton campaign and interviewing Comms Director Jennifer Palmieri without disclosing you and your wife hosted a dinner in her honor at your home!https://twitter.com/chucktodd/status/986209382487687168 …
I would argue you are falling into the equivocation game. What Hannity and Fox do is very different, it’s next level misinformation and propaganda. CNN and MSNBC were not for one candidate over the other. Their loyalty was to ratings and controversy, not candidates.
-
-
Yes, the media is dictated to by advertisers. That’s one of its biggest failings. Yet, I don’t think that’s the discussion here. It’s about collusion between politicians and the corporate media, and to think for one second CNN or MSNBC aren’t culpable in this regard is naive
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Does being that blind cause you trouble in your daily life?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Uh huh. If that were true they would've covered Bernie's rallies which were busting with insane crowds rather than Trump's empty podium. If that many people went to see him live millions would've watched on tv
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are you crazy? Ed Schultz has explained how MSNBC was in the tank for Clinton. It was obvious.https://twitter.com/LeftwardSwing/status/985966677740302341 …
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.