More explanation, from NYT, on why the Daily used that Stephen Miller interview (on the record, and quoted in print) but not the audio:https://twitter.com/NYTimesPR/status/1009104308988674048 …
Show this thread
I can't answer for the decision, as I'm not the NYT's ombudsman. I *do* think it's noteworthy that Trump notoriously loved how vehemently Stephen Miller would stick up for him on the TV, but now the WH is skittish about having people hear his voice defend child separation.https://twitter.com/jayrosen_nyu/status/1009060724893716481 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, good point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It would be a good time to *have* an ombudsman/public editor, though.
-
This is precisely the kind of thing you have them around for, yes!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Sort of. More specifically, the role was supposed to fall to the "Reader Center." The publisher's argument for it is here (scroll down) -- https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/22/reader-center/ag-sulzberger-publisher-reader-questions.html … -- and here's a rebuttal to that argument: https://longreads.com/2018/01/25/does-a-g-sulzberger-even-understand-what-a-public-editor-is/ …
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.