This is not wrong, but it's interesting to phrase it this way. Since when are we sad about megacorps having less money and control? Also who is "we"?https://twitter.com/bitmaker_me/status/936619083168018433 …
It may be more accurate to think of the Linux Foundation as a monopoly company that sustains itself through a few major value generators plus M&A.
-
-
How so? Feels like the M&A part breaks down pretty quickly because a project can always leave the foundation. They aren’t transferring copyright to the foundation right?
-
Sure. Not a perfect analogy. Just trying to get at why the model isn't replicable. M&A is a useful metaphor in the sense that smaller competitors can't survive long enough to grow.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.