They weren't valid. They showed a clear lack of understanding of how medical science works.
I've provided two systematic reviews which indicate benefits of male circumcision. They were ignored, in much the same way that research justifying vaccines is ignored.
-
-
And we're really not on the same page here. This science denying moron ignores systematic review of clinical research. You fucks are dumber that half the anti-vaxx people I've met, and that's saying something.
-
We're not on the same page here. Because: 1) You are clearly of the opinion that all systematic reviews are beyond criticism. 2) You (had) no knowledge of the principle author's reputation for statistical manipulation, bias and constant self-referencing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.