@politico 1. 6 years ago. 2. Not private. 3. In her official capacity. 4. No campaign funds expended. 5. Didn't lie about it under oath.
Asked if she'd met with Kislyak, Pelosi said: "Not with this Russian ambassador, no." A 2010 photo shows otherwise. http://politi.co/2m4m6Cl pic.twitter.com/CxF7SXEG0Q
-
-
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
@politico@marymauldin WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT RUSSIANS HACKED OUR ELECTION SYSTEM. THIS LIAR needs to be asked for PROOF! -
@WTPatty@politico@marymauldin We need to write a post card supporting our President and mail it on March 15th!pic.twitter.com/ihNjHaHaGL
-
-
@politico@NancyPelosi needs to resign. If not she needs to be impeached. -
@politico we know the difference why don't you? This constant pushing of a half-story doesn't look good at all. -
-
@politico Are you guys really going to play it like this?? She DID NOT meet with him alone! -
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
@politico Context is everything. Pelosi didn't meet in private and then lie about it. - 1 more reply
-
-
-
@politico was she asked under oath? asking for a friend. -
-
@alfwats09@politico one is crimevthe other isn't relevant. Snowflake.
-
-
@politico click bait, good one. A formal group dinner is not a one on one with
ambassador. Lol -
@politico was she under oath? Did she meet privately? -
@politico yes, and Hillary met with him too. Are we playing into false equivalence again?#russiagate -
-
@politico she should resign
-
@juliepickering5@politico Because Trump is drawing false analogies to distract from his treasonous bromance with Putin?
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.