All nominees - male or female - should be asked under oath whether or not they've committed sexual assault and/or sexual harassment. #MeToo
advocates for all victims, not only women.
-
-
-
He was asked and said no
-
If the claims are substantiated, then he committed perjury.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
“Fiasco” sure is the right word for it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They got EXACTLY the candidate they wanted. He WAS vetted - they just got caught at the last moment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This should have been done post-Thomas Clarence. FBI and the vetting process is waaaaay behind the times.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nominate more women to SCOTUS. Problem solved. You're welcome.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good.
@waltshaub I would write a book on how to vet. What is considered disqualifying There need to be RULESThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That'd be great, thanks
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Before that we had the Garland fiasco, which changed some things
-
Wasn’t a fiasco except in democrats minds. We all realize he only had 10 votes on the SJC he needed 11. Had he been given a hearing he wouldn’t ever be able to be nominated again. At least now a democratic president can still nominate him if he has a democratic senate.
-
Yeah not giving him a hearing, whether he had the votes or not doesn’t matter.
-
So then he never has a shot ever to be a justice? How is that fair? Why subject him to it if he doesn’t have the 11 votes?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Gang rape will be on par with experimenting with pot in college. I didn’t cum is the new I didn’t inhale.
-
So a 20 year old women was at parties with 15-17 year olds watching them get drugged and raped? Never called the cops and went to them over and over. Makes no sense seems she is off balanced.
-
If she’s lying she needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Let the FBI investigate. What’s the rush?
-
Because democrats at the start wanted to destroy him. The president is allowed to make a selection and democrats think they have more power as the minority than they do. This is purely politics
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
nausea meds will be provided with water.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.