Everyone she named as witnesses say they were not at any party where she was assaulted. Can anyone corroborate her claim? Can anyone identify the house where it took place? (Ford can’t.) Can anyone say what date this took place? (Ford can’t.) Why is this farce being allowed?
-
-
-
Wher did you get all those infos? Link please
-
Spend a few minutes looking for them. They are easy to find. The last one (the female witness Ford claims was there) came out about an hour ago. She has said (through her attorney) that she was not at the claimed party.
-
Note also that Ford has to date, apparently refused to file the appropriate charges in Montgomery County, the jurisdiction that has the legal authority to investigate her allegation. It is as if she is being very careful to not say anything under oath at any level.
-
And for someone who claims she wants to tell her story to the committee, she seems very reluctant. Grassley has given her 6 different options, from private to public, to over the phone, with only staff, etc.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
John Cornyn being clear before the hearing that he will be hostile to Dr Blasey Ford. Why won't you allow an investigation?
-
Investigation in not what? There is nothing to investigate. She doesn't remember any details except 4 names, and all 4 names said they were at no such party.
-
If there's nothing to investigate then the investigation will be over quickly. But we won't know that as long as they block the investigation.
-
What world are you living in? No one is blocking any investigation. Ford and her lawyers (as puppets for the democrats) are the one holding up any investigation.
-
Then surely it won't hurt to get those four people named speaking about the issue under oath, just to confirm that they weren't at the party. An investigation would look deeper into other evidence, I.e. letters from women like Cristina King.
-
The 4 people named all wrote a letter under oath!! The only 1 who has written a letter not under oath is Ford.
-
Ford passed a lie detector test, why won’t Kavanaugh take the test? Because he knows he will fail the lie detector test!
-
So what. They will not release what questions she answered in this polygraph. I want to know what questions she answered and who paid for and created the test for her.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
What’s the rush! Let the FBI investigate and have the judge take a polygraph, seeing Dr Ford already did & passed.
-
Polygraph is inadmissible, FBI does not investigate local crimes, already vetted Kavanaugh 6 times, refused additional investigation based on lack of REAL evidence. Move on to hearing, then vote!!!
-
He’s also testified under oath he didn’t do. He could be arrested for that, if he wasz lying. That’s more impressive than a polygraph too.
-
That’s why they need to polygraph. Someone is lying. If he has nothing to hide then just do it. The American ppl have a right to know. The majority of Americans don’t believe him.
-
I was a polygraph instructor at Fort McClellan, Alabama. A smart person can beat it 99 times out of a 100 and some people just can’t pass it, even if they tell the truth. That’s why it’s not admissible in court.
-
Ford has a Ph.d in psychology.. I bet she knows how to beat a poly. She named 4 witnesses, none corroborated her story. If she wants an investigation she needs to file a police report where the alleged crime occured.
-
Also she may believe it happened so she’d pass. Who knows, maybe it happened with someone, it just wasn’t Kavanaugh
-
Innocent people don't need rehab. Guess that shows he isn't innocent. From a Republican commentator!pic.twitter.com/aoai75sdas
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.