One assumes that, even knowing little about the methods, officials would notice the same man coming in to vote multiple times.
-
-
-
Indeed. The core reason is that the risk is high, the penalties are serious and you need to do it a lot to make a difference.
-
Postal vote manipulation has a much lower risk, which is why I'd like to see a significant clampdown there. Far more important.
-
There are more checks though I assume, and you'd have to intercept someone's post? I am confident in the voting system as it stands.
-
AIUI, what happens is that people visit postal voters and then ensure they vote the "right" way.
-
Illegal, natch, but it makes voter intimidation much easier.
-
Ah so intimidation rather than impersonation? Hadn't thought of that.
-
Yeah. I know of intermittent problems with abusive relationships, and sometimes with very closely-knit communities.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.