A lot of the criticisms people use to talk about AI (influence on inequality, monopoly-burnishing capabilities, bias towards underrepresented people, mostly opaque to the public, etc) are also equally valid criticisms of neoliberalism. AI augments the system it is deployed in.
-
-
I don't want you to be right about this, but I suspect you might be right about this.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Not equal balance in that context.
#Tech inherently neoliberal and as such, based on much of science fiction, completely ideological. Criticisms to it are valid, and are made by people who do not possess the same power ratio for its outcomes—that impact their very real lives.Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
In other words, it is a stacked argument with a power balance that favors an elite few, who are very very very ideological.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
1) There are plenty of bad articles badly arguing the above points, but I'm sympathetic to the idea that some technologies do exert a directional force toward certain social, political, and military outcomes.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
2) It's well documented in economics, for example, that industries with very high fixed costs and low marginal costs tend to become monopolies. Similarly, broadcast radio seems to favor cultural homogeneity more than, say, social media
-
Please expand re radio vs. "Social media" - I am not comprehending.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
3) I think it's reasonable to suggest that current AI tech has its own suite of directional forces, but these will evolve along with the technology. Perhaps future tech progress will reduce capital costs and network effects.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.