If you think to yourself: Why are conservatives so skeptical of "science," then ask yourself what the New York Times would say about the social sciences if 95% of professors were conservatives and 80% were Trump voters.
Näytä tämä ketju
-
It is certainly not. Dogmas are established with reference to authority, while evolution of organisms during history of life is incontrovertible fact supported by extensive, overwhelming evidence from fossils, genetics, embryology, biogeography etc.
It's not a fact, it's a theory (that I believe in), and it's not incontrovertible, because nothing in science is. If you believe it's incontrovertible, it's a dogma to you. Have a nice day.
-
-
Not true, natural selection is a theory that explains the process of evolution (well and long established fact.) Incontrovertible and dogma are different words. There are some things that are incontrovertible.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Few incontrovertible scientific facts: Living organisms are made of cells, Fundamental unit of nervous system is neuron, infectious diseases are caused by germs. Are any of this dogmas?
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
We are lucky Germ theory of disease does not refute any religious nonsense or require government interventions, there would be tons of conservative think tanks claiming that Louis Pasteur was a leftist fraud and bacteria do not exist.
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.