If you think to yourself: Why are conservatives so skeptical of "science," then ask yourself what the New York Times would say about the social sciences if 95% of professors were conservatives and 80% were Trump voters.
Näytä tämä ketju
-
Denying evolution and climate science is denying science, not “science”.
Combatting climate alarmism is science, not "science". And there are valid objections to Darwin's theory.
-
-
More than 99.9% of peer-reviewed scientific papers agree that climate change is mainly caused by humans. We may disagree on what to do about it and remain scientific, but denying it because for ideological reasons, as many conservatives do, is unscientific.
-
Read "Unsettled". You have a lot to learn.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Objections to Darwin's theory, really? Name one valid objection.
-
Not enough time, etc.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.