Our current math is about as sophisticated as retina + V1 + V2 (which is why that’s all we can - barely - understand). Your full visual cortex etc. would leave QFT in the dust if it was evolutionarily useful.
-
Sorry Pedro, but no. It doesn't make sense to say that S2 is more powerful than mathematical physics, itself a product thereof, organized in science-producing societies. Modern science is way beyond the grasp of (and couldn't have been built by) any S2 of any individual.
No, what I’m saying is that S1 is more powerful, *not* S2. Clearly my point has not come across at all. I’m saying your S1 does physics-relevant math much better than modern science, as illustrated by humans vs. robots. Anyway, let’s take it up F2F when we get the chance.
-
-
Sure, let's discuss this sometime. But we're back at the starting point. Humans (S1) are better than robots only at certain tasks, at the space-time scales in which brains evolved. Robots can be much more precise (surgery), or much faster, than any human. 1/2
-
System 1 is just a large collection of heuristics to deal (without thinking, S2) with the world around us, thus it is fine-tuned by evolution and early learning to our macroscopic space-time scales. It fails miserably in unfamiliar situations, and it is very hard to retrain.
Keskustelun loppu
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.