It’s a basic ML fact that there’s an infinity of laws compatible with the same observations. Which ones we believe is more a function of psychology than physics.
-
True, but a good part of psychology is intuitive physics.
Your brain’s knowledge of physics is in many ways more sophisticated than any physics textbook’s.
-
-
Yes, but only at certain narrow ranges of time, space, energy, and only visible phenomena. Human intuition totally fails at fluid behavior on small scales and is blind to most electromagnetism (other than visible light). Human intuitive physics only sees a small part of reality.
-
But if you applied the brain’s physics inference engine to the full range of observations, it would blow Einstein away.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.